Gta 5 Moorehead Rides Again Giff
| WikiProject Video games | (Rated Redirect-grade) | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Has nobody the cast list for VCPR? In my "Inquirer" isn't the cast for the talk station so I'm not able practise add it! Someone who tin can exercise that? ProSieben 18:12, v Dec 2006 (UTC)
added Vice City Public Radio [edit]
its on the official site on the "gunkhole bear witness" department
Paradise FM [edit]
Does anyone know the first vocal from the Paradise Fm department of the website? Only the latter 2 are listed on this page. 08:01, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
removed Emotion 98.three [edit]
its a rumor not confirmed[1]
Information technology is official at present, information technology's on the site, along with Flash FM.
Where did all of those songs come from?
- well there is something called a Official site~ moe 16:00, xix September 2006 (UTC)
-
- Been in that location done that, and since when were these songs (Motorhead-Ace of Spades, Ozzy Osbourne-Crazy Train, Alice Cooper-Feed My Frankenstein, Iron Maiden-Number of the Animal, Scorpions-Rock You Like a Hurricane, Def Leppard-Rock of Ages) on the official site JonBidinger 10:35, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
- how should i know i only listen to talk radio in gta~ moe 11:21, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
-
- It's speculation at best up to this signal. No ane knows. If it'due south non on any GTA fansites but information technology'due south on here, it's fake. There should only be three songs on Five-Rock at this point (9/26/06), iii on Wave 103, and two on Paradise FM..and the fishing show on VCPR
If I'm right in saying that this game is set in 84, then shouldn't there be a note for those songs released after this yr? I've already found one, Easy Lover, which was released the year after.
Anyhow, it'due south just a suggestion.--Skully Collins 12:47, vii November 2006 (UTC)
- Manifestly it came out in 1984[two][3]. Could Wikipedia exist incorrect? ~ IICATSII dial the keys 12:57, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- But co-ordinate to the Official Collins Website, information technology was released in 85.--Skully Collins xiii:32, vii Nov 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Co-ordinate to my copy of 'The Great Stone Discography', Easy Lover was released in the US in Nov 1984 and so released in the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland in March 1985. Dbam 17:35, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
-
I bought VCS and there are no credits for VCPR in the "Vice City Inquirer". No logo and no show names and characters and and then on. Is it only in mine? ProSieben 13:54, 11 Nov 2006 (UTC)
I retrieve the voice actors should be added (similar the other GTA soundtrack articles). ProSieben 00:xi, 18 Nov 2006 (UTC)
Grand-chat [edit]
is there a k-chat in gtavcs? --—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.113.232.143 (talk • contribs) 12/1/2006 8:32:06 PM.
i am pretty sure there isn't a k-conversation in vcs -hotspot
- He'south right! 14:45, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
I believe the voiceover for the Time Ranger is done by Anthony Cumia of the Opie and Anthony bear witness. Can anyone verify this? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.2.164.96 (talk) 07:26, 10 December 2006 (UTC).
Do y'all recognize his phonation or where you've got this info from? Take a look at your game manuals! ProSieben 20:07, thirteen December 2006 (UTC)
On the Opie and Anthony satellite radio show they played clips of each corresponding role, crediting Anthony with the "old timey" style voiceover. I do non remember the date, but I think it was during the weeks prior to the game's release.
The plot line for the fictional motion-picture show Push Upwards as well has a striking similarity to another Sylvester Stallone movie Over the Top68.43.219.69 02:59, 24 December 2006 (UTC)Jbegin
Should the moving-picture show for American Motors really exist on this page equally it seems similar advertising. 202.89.142.246 01:23, viii February 2007 (UTC)
The Release glue commercial is a satire of Freshen-up ("the mucilage that goes eject!"). Freshen Upwards ad —Preceding unsigned comment added past 67.101.147.103 (talk) 02:04, 27 Oct 2010 (UTC)
The official Vice Metropolis Stories website has a logo of Gordon Moor(e)head's show, and it says "Moorehead Rides Once more" with "E" ProSieben 16:12, 16 Jan 2007 (UTC)
Exercise we really demand a references needed tag for the entire article? It'southward obvious that the source is the game itself (plus the guide). I'll revert the tag at the meridian of the article in 2 or 3 days if no one disagrees. Malc82 12:46, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- removed Malc82 09:55, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
This article was automatically assessed because at to the lowest degree one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start grade. BetacommandBot 19:21, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Prototype:Flashfm.jpg is existence used on this article. I notice the epitome page specifies that the epitome is being used nether off-white utilise but there is no caption or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair employ. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this epitome in each commodity is consistent with off-white utilise.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair utilise rationale. Using 1 of the templates at Wikipedia:Off-white utilise rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Exercise not just insert a blank template on an image page.
If in that location is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the off-white employ rationale on the other images used on this page. Annotation that any fair employ images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one calendar week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Image:Paradisefm.jpg is being used on this commodity. I discover the image page specifies that the epitome is existence used under fair utilize but there is no explanation or rationale every bit to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair utilise. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the prototype clarification page a specific caption or rationale for why using this epitome in each article is consistent with fair employ.
Delight get to the prototype description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair utilize rationale guideline is an piece of cake way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but recall that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a bare template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair apply images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have whatsoever questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions folio. Give thanks you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 17:22, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Image:VCPR.jpg is existence used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use just in that location is no explanation or rationale as to why its utilize in this Wikipedia commodity constitutes off-white use. In addition to the boilerplate off-white employ template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this paradigm in each article is consequent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit information technology to include a fair apply rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an piece of cake way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must consummate the template. Practise not simply insert a bare template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Annotation that any fair utilize images defective such an explanation can exist deleted 1 week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions delight ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Cheers.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:17, 21 Jan 2008 (UTC)
Image:Vcfl.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the epitome page specifies that the image is beingness used under fair utilise but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia commodity constitutes fair utilise. In addition to the boilerplate off-white utilize template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair utilise.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair employ rationale. Using 1 of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy style to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but recall that you must complete the template. Do not only insert a bare template on an epitome page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you take specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Notation that whatever fair employ images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week later being tagged, equally described on criteria for speedy deletion. If yous have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Cheers.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Vrock.jpg is beingness used on this article. I find the paradigm page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its utilize in this Wikipedia article constitutes off-white use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, y'all must also write out on the prototype description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this paradigm in each article is consistent with off-white use.
Please go to the epitome description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy fashion to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, simply remember that y'all must complete the template. Exercise not merely insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair employ rationale on the other images used on this page. Notation that whatsoever fair use images defective such an explanation can be deleted i week subsequently being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you accept whatsoever questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thanks.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:06, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Wave103.jpg is being used on this commodity. I find the prototype page specifies that the image is existence used nether fair utilise but there is no explanation or rationale equally to why its apply in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In add-on to the boilerplate off-white use template, y'all must also write out on the image clarification page a specific caption or rationale for why using this paradigm in each article is consistent with fair apply.
Please get to the image description page and edit it to include a fair utilize rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an piece of cake manner to insure that your paradigm is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, only remember that y'all must complete the template. Do non simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair utilise media, consider checking that you have specified the fair utilize rationale on the other images used on this folio. Note that whatever fair use images lacking such an explanation can exist deleted one week after existence tagged, every bit described on criteria for speedy deletion. If y'all have any questions please inquire them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Flashfm.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the paradigm page specifies that the prototype is being used nether fair use merely there is no caption or rationale every bit to why its utilise in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In improver to the boilerplate fair apply template, you must also write out on the image description folio a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each commodity is consistent with off-white apply.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using 1 of the templates at Wikipedia:Off-white utilize rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your epitome is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must consummate the template. Practise not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair apply rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that whatsoever off-white use images defective such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have whatever questions delight ask them at the Media copyright questions folio. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Espantoso.jpg is existence used on this article. I notice the prototype page specifies that the image is being used under off-white employ but in that location is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia commodity constitutes fair employ. In addition to the average fair apply template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific caption or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair employ.
Delight become to the paradigm description page and edit it to include a off-white utilise rationale. Using 1 of the templates at Wikipedia:Off-white employ rationale guideline is an piece of cake way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but think that you lot must complete the template. Practice not but insert a blank template on an paradigm page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you accept specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that whatever fair apply images lacking such an caption tin can exist deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If yous take whatsoever questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank yous.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:24, thirteen February 2008 (UTC)
Epitome:Emotion983.jpg is existence used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the prototype is beingness used under fair use simply there is no caption or rationale every bit to why its use in this Wikipedia commodity constitutes fair use. In add-on to the average fair use template, you must also write out on the image description folio a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the prototype clarification page and edit information technology to include a fair use rationale. Using ane of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an piece of cake fashion to ensure that your paradigm is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but retrieve that you must consummate the template. Practice not simply insert a bare template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that y'all have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted 1 week afterward existence tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you lot have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thanks.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:47, xiii Feb 2008 (UTC)
Paradigm:Freshfm.jpg is existence used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is beingness used under off-white apply merely in that location is no explanation or rationale equally to why its utilize in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair employ. In addition to the average fair use template, you must also write out on the image clarification page a specific caption or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair utilize.
Please go to the epitome description page and edit information technology to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your epitome is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that yous must consummate the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an prototype folio.
If in that location is other off-white use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair utilise images defective such an explanation can be deleted ane calendar week afterward being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If y'all have whatsoever questions please enquire them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:51, thirteen February 2008 (UTC)
Prototype:Paradisefm.jpg is being used on this commodity. I notice the prototype folio specifies that the prototype is being used under fair use but in that location is no explanation or rationale as to why its employ in this Wikipedia commodity constitutes fair use. In improver to the boilerplate fair use template, you must likewise write out on the image description page a specific caption or rationale for why using this paradigm in each article is consistent with off-white use.
Delight go to the prototype clarification page and edit information technology to include a fair employ rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Off-white utilise rationale guideline is an easy style to ensure that your paradigm is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that y'all must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an prototype page.
If there is other off-white employ media, consider checking that you lot have specified the fair utilise rationale on the other images used on this folio. Notation that any fair use images defective such an explanation tin can be deleted one week afterwards being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you lot have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Give thanks you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 00:49, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
I noticed this in the Wave 103 department nearly Trish Camden: "past the time of Grand Theft Auto: Vice City, she has returned to the station every bit its imaging voice." Does everyone have any solid show to suggest that this is the case? The name of the imaging vox character is never revealed and she's non even voiced by the same actress, so I don't see where that claim has come up from. Christophee (talk) 00:47, eighteen Nov 2009 (UTC)
Genres not mention or ignored [edit]
I believe the proper apply of music genres need to be antiseptic in each radio station. The Genres are incorrectly mentioned with accordance with each songs own genres. For a expert instance, nosotros meet that Emotion 98.iii is just Power Ballad is irksome and non showing much in the style of intelligent input, the lack of knowledge from users lack whatsoever good empathise of music. I will fix these genes in each radio station with account of the songs listed in the station playlist. Nosotros can discuss that further, merely it'south fair to say in proper apply of knowledge is shown.
Emotion 98.three should have Power Ballad as main, with New wave and Soft rock in the 2d and 3rd of row. With Wink FM having Pop, New wave, Stone and SynthPop mentioned.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Grand_Theft_Auto:_Vice_City_Stories_soundtrack
0 Response to "Gta 5 Moorehead Rides Again Giff"
Post a Comment